[ad_1]
/* customized css */
.tdi_102_654{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_104_166{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_106_358{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_108_81e{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Hello everybody, I’m Daphne, a 13-year-old going into eighth grade.
I’m writing to check “common” Khan Academy (no AI) to Khanmigo (powered by GPT4), utilizing three of my very own made-up standards.
They’re: effectivity, effectiveness, and enjoyability. Effectivity is how briskly I’m able to cowl a math subject and get primary understanding. Effectiveness is my high quality of understanding—the distinction between primary and superior understanding. And the ultimate one—most essential to youngsters and possibly least essential to adults who make youngsters study math—is enjoyability.
Reviewing Khan Academy
Let’s begin with “common” Khan Academy to see the way it matches these classes. Khan Academy is a mixture of observe drawback units and video explainers. Only for private context, I meet with a math tutor as soon as per week, and a few weeks I get assigned one or two 30-minute drawback units as homework. I’ve most likely labored by means of greater than 50 of those up to now couple years.
By way of effectivity, Khan Academy is admittedly strong: 5.5 out of 10. If you happen to perceive the subject, like including fractions, then you are able to do these in a breeze, and the additional observe enhances your comprehension of the subject. Nonetheless, in the event you get confused, then what? You possibly can click on on trace. However doing that comes at a value: you may’t get “credit score” anymore for getting a proper reply by yourself.
If you happen to do click on on a improper reply, you get a grey dot that symbolizes improper. That bothers me. If you happen to’re a perfectionist like myself, it’s doable to spend half-hour over that one query you’re uncertain of, not eager to see the grey dot. After a improper reply, you may click on the get assist button and obtain a prolonged rationalization on how it’s best to’ve executed the issue. You possibly can then transfer on and apply the data you realized to the subsequent query.
Okay, now comes effectiveness. Once more, my ranking is 5.5 out of 10. An everyday Khan train isn’t superb at instructing you new issues—the trace and rationalization should not sufficient in the event you’re actually confused—however is great at reinforcing what you already know. Now, it could be unfair for me to say this; I notice there are movies to show a brand new subject. Me and my mates discover them boring—maybe efficient, however I by no means use them. On Commonsense Media critiques, it looks like numerous youngsters really feel this fashion.
Final however, in my thoughts, definitely not least, enjoyability: 6 out of 10. Simply throughout, Khan feels the identical as a standard drawback set at school. Let’s be sincere, talking for almost all of youngsters, math is a chore. (Sorry, Dad.) However Khan tends to be fairly easy at serving to you get this chore executed, and for teenagers like me that simply wish to get the work over with, Khan isn’t that dangerous. Not too particular and maybe a bit bland, however not horrible.
All in all, Khan Academy “Authentic Recipe” will get a strong ranking of 6 out of 10.
/* customized css */
.tdi_110_dc5{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_112_15d{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Interacting with Khanmigo
Transferring on, let’s take a look at Khanmigo. My dad gave me this instruction: attempt to study a subject that I have no idea. So I selected scientific notation.
First, let me present you what Migo is. Khanmigo requested me:
/* customized css */
.tdi_114_545{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_116_5b5{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 3000?
/* customized css */
.tdi_118_6e8{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_120_551{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
3^1000
/* customized css */
.tdi_122_5a6{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_124_591{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s my take: Scientific notation is a manner of expressing numbers which can be too massive or too small to be conveniently written in decimal kind. It’s written as a product of a quantity between 1 and 10 and an influence of 10.
So, for the quantity 3000, we will break it down like this:
3000 = 3 * 1000
We all know that 1000 is 10 to the facility of three (as a result of 101010 = 1000). So we will rewrite 1000 as 10^3.
So, 3000 in scientific notation is 3 * 10^3.
Evaluating this together with your reply, it appears to be like like there was a little bit of a mix-up. You wrote 3^1000, which implies 3 raised to the facility of 1000, a quantity a lot bigger than 3000. That’s okay, although! Errors are a part of studying.
Now, let’s transfer to the subsequent query.
Query 2 of 10:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 0.004?
Keep in mind, you may ask for a touch in the event you want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_126_5d8{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_128_565{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
that was to many elements can u go over that once more with much less phrases
/* customized css */
.tdi_130_bfb{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_132_db5{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Positive, I can simplify it!
For the quantity 3000:
• Break it into 3 and 1000.
• Write 1000 as 10^3 (as a result of 101010 = 1000).
• So, 3000 = 3 * 10^3 in scientific notation.
Now, for the subsequent query:
What’s 0.004 in scientific notation?
Keep in mind, you may ask for a touch in the event you want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_134_d58{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_136_531{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Okay, reader, Daphne right here once more. What do you assume occurred subsequent? Was I capable of get the subsequent query proper? Let’s discover out.
/* customized css */
.tdi_138_a5a{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_140_ffb{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
i dont understand how to do that.
/* customized css */
.tdi_142_d83{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_144_5bc{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
No drawback in any respect! Right here’s a touch:
When a quantity is lower than 1 and we wish to write it in scientific notation, we use adverse exponents.
For instance, 0.1 might be written as 1 * 10^-1.
Now, attempt to write 0.004 in scientific notation.
/* customized css */
.tdi_146_dba{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_148_0b1{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
4 * 10^-0.01
/* customized css */
.tdi_150_5b5{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_152_434{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Okay, reader. Think about you had been my human tutor. What would you say at this level in the event you noticed my reply above?
Nicely, right here is Migo’s response.
/* customized css */
.tdi_154_858{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_156_155{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s how I might do it:
When we’ve a quantity like 0.004, we wish to transfer the decimal level to the proper till we’ve a quantity between 1 and 10. On this case, we transfer the decimal level 3 locations to the proper to get 4.
Every time we transfer the decimal level to the proper, we subtract 1 from the exponent of 10. So, since we moved the decimal level 3 locations, our exponent is -3.
So, 0.004 in scientific notation is 4 * 10^-3.
Evaluating this together with your reply, it appears to be like like there was a mix-up with the exponent. You wrote 10^-0.01, however it needs to be 10^-3. That’s okay, although! Errors are a part of studying.
Now, let’s transfer to the subsequent query.
Query 3 of 10:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 70000?
Keep in mind, you may ask for a touch in the event you want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_158_bb8{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_160_658{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
once more, too many phrases. act as if im not very good
/* customized css */
.tdi_162_553{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_164_b6d{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
I’m positive you’re good! Let’s break it down.
For 0.004:
• Transfer decimal 3 locations proper to get 4.
• This offers us 4 * 10^-3.
Now, for 70000 in scientific notation:
• Break it into ? and 10000
• Write 10000 as 10^?.
• So, 70000 = ? * 10^?.
Are you able to fill within the “?” to write down 70000 in scientific notation?
/* customized css */
.tdi_166_526{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_168_553{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
7
/* customized css */
.tdi_170_910{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_172_c56{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s my take:
You’re proper concerning the first half! The quantity we’re working with is 7.
For the quantity 70000:
• We break it into 7 and 10000.
• We write 10000 as 10^4 (as a result of 101010*10 = 10000).
• So, 70000 = 7 * 10^4 in scientific notation.
Evaluating this together with your reply, you bought the primary half proper! The quantity we’re working with is certainly 7. However bear in mind, we additionally want to precise the variety of zeros as an influence of 10. On this case, it’s 10^4.
You’re doing nice! Let’s transfer on to the subsequent query.
Query 4 of 10:
What’s the scientific notation for the quantity 0.0008?
Keep in mind, it’s okay to ask for a touch in the event you want one!
/* customized css */
.tdi_174_b8c{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_176_0fc{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne sorts:
8 * 10^-4
/* customized css */
.tdi_178_c45{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_180_5c3{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Migo sorts:
Right here’s how I might do it:
When we’ve a quantity like 0.0008, we wish to transfer the decimal level to the proper till we’ve a quantity between 1 and 10. On this case, we transfer the decimal level 4 locations to the proper to get 8.
Every time we transfer the decimal level to the proper, we subtract 1 from the exponent of 10. So, since we moved the decimal level 4 locations, our exponent is -4.
So, 0.0008 in scientific notation is 8 * 10^-4.
Evaluating this together with your reply, it appears to be like such as you acquired it precisely proper! Nice job.
/* customized css */
.tdi_182_388{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_184_555{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Reviewing Khanmigo
Okay, reader, Daphne right here once more. Now listed below are my scores of Migo.
For effectivity, Khanmigo is above Khan Common. 6.5 out of 10 (versus 5.5 out of 10).
If the bot’s response is just too lengthy, you may modify it. (Simply ask, “Are you able to simplify that for me?”) If the issue is just too simple, the bot could make the subsequent one tougher. You possibly can really study much more in loads much less time. The one half that bothered me was that typically it took some time for the responses to load, so I used to be sitting there bored ready for a bit.
For effectiveness, not solely are you able to study much more in loads much less time, however you may study much more in depth. It’s fairly totally different from common Khan within the that Khan Authentic is just like the work a tutor would assign you, and Migo is like an precise tutor. You possibly can ask questions, starting from wanting kind of data. So, for effectiveness: 7.5 out of 10 (versus 5.5 out of 10).
And as for enjoyability, I’d say youngsters’ solutions would differ fairly a bit. Some would benefit from the participating, thought-provoking elements, whereas others would somewhat simply do work independently. Personally, I feel I really want common Khan, which surprises me, however I suppose on this uncommon state of affairs, I really just like the simplicity of normal Khan. Possibly I simply didn’t really feel like considering that arduous. So, for enjoyability: 5 out of 10 for me.
All in all, Khanmigo will get an 8 out of 10 holistic ranking. Since you study loads, shortly.
Conclusion
To conclude, Migo is sort of a instructor, and common Khan Downside Units are like homework. So clearly you study extra from the instructor, however sometimes the instructor can ramble on. However homework that serves merely as observe for matters you already realized in school is admittedly a good instrument with its personal perks, even in the event you could be studying much less and the standard is decrease.
/* customized css */
.tdi_186_dd6{
min-height: 0;
}
/* customized css */
.tdi_188_55f{
vertical-align: baseline;
}
Daphne Goldstein is an eighth grader at Watertown (Mass.) Center Faculty. She likes volleyball, psychology, and iced chai lattes.
The submit Evaluating On-line and AI-Assisted Studying: A Scholar’s View appeared first on Schooling Subsequent.
[ad_2]
